On September 30, GivingData and Technology Association of Grantmakers (TAG) hosted an interactive conversation with the goal of building a data practice taxonomy for philanthropy.
This session marked the first step in a collaborative effort to create a shared framework for data practices, which will culminate in a data summit slated for 2026.
Why start here? Because while strong data practices are essential for driving impact, many organizations struggle to know where to begin or how to identify gaps.
TAG and GivingData introduced a draft taxonomy that organizes the full landscape of data work into nine core domains:
|
Domain of Practice |
Draft Definition |
|
Data Sources & Infrastructure |
The systems, databases, and sources (internal and external) where data is collected, structured, and managed, and how they interoperate. |
|
Data Hygiene & Quality |
The methods used to ensure data is reliable (i.e., accurate, up-to-date, consistent) and usable in analysis, reporting, and decision making. |
|
Data Use |
How data is applied in reporting, learning, and decision-making. |
|
Data Governance |
The policies, roles, and responsibilities for managing and guiding the use of data assets. |
|
Data Sharing & Collaboration |
How organizations share data internally and externally for collective use. |
|
Data Ownership & Ethics |
The policies and mindsets that guide who has access to and control over data, primarily as they affect nonprofit partners and communities. |
|
Data Equity & Inclusion |
The practices that ensure data does not perpetuate bias or harm, and is used to highlight disparities and promote justice. |
|
Data Literacy & Capacity |
The skills, knowledge, and experience that empower people to manage, understand, interpret, and act on data effectively. |
|
Data Culture |
The shared beliefs, norms, values, attitudes, and behaviors that shape how people perceive, value, and engage with/use data. |
These domains are paired with a maturity model that helps organizations assess where they are and identify opportunities for growth.
The conversation primarily focused on the draft taxonomy. Within breakout groups, TAG members shared thoughtful feedback on what’s missing. Here is some of what we heard:
Overall, participants appreciated the clarity of the draft taxonomy and acknowledged its usefulness, even in this early version. Their feedback will guide the next iteration of the taxonomy and ensure it reflects the realities and priorities of the philanthropic sector.
As Roberto Cremonini shared during the session, “What’s missing is a common language—a comprehensive way of looking at all the practices around data, and most of all, a maturity model.”
By creating this shared language, TAG and GivingData aim to:
Your feedback is critical to shaping this framework. Please take a few minutes to share your thoughts on the taxonomy and suggest improvements by completing our survey:
👉 Fill out the survey here. Together, we can build stronger data practices that drive greater impact across philanthropy.